Aroma Pets

Holistic Therapy For Pets

How the death of the EU president’s beloved pony led to a ‘war’ on wolves

How the death of the EU president’s beloved pony led to a ‘war’ on wolves

Ursula von der Leyen with Dolly, her pony, before the animal was killed by a wolf in 2022 - Ursula Von Der Leyen/Instagram

Ursula von der Leyen with Dolly, her pony, before the animal was killed by a wolf in 2022 - Ursula Von Der Leyen/Instagram

It has all the ingredients of a folk tale or fable: wolves, hunters, dark forests, a faithful steed, death, a secret vow of vengeance and a strong-willed female protagonist, nicknamed “Little Rose” by her family, who could turn out to be either the heroine or a wicked ice queen. The difference is that this story also pitches Brussels bureaucrats against conservationist non-governmental organisations. 

It began in the early hours of a misty September morning two years ago, when a lone wolf crept out of the woods just outside the hamlet of Beinhorn, in the German state of Lower Saxony. The predator then killed a chestnut pony with a white patch on her face in a paddock close to a farmhouse. In all likelihood the story would have struggled to ripple beyond the local press had it not been for the fact that the pony, Dolly, by all accounts a very sweet-natured beast, was owned by Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission. “The whole family is horribly distressed by the news,” she said in a statement afterwards.

Dolly, 30, was discovered some 300ft from Von der Leyen’s country home and duly became a posthumous symbol of the difficulties caused by the booming populations of wolves across Europe. Just a year after the pony’s sad demise, Von der Leyen announced a plan that conservationists claim smacks of revenge. And this week, the protected status of grey wolves was downgraded, meaning they will soon be fair game for hunters once more after 45 years of strict safeguarding. Officials have adopted European Union proposals that will allow member countries to set a quota for the number of wolves that can be killed each year from the beginning of March 2025.

Officials say this is a relatively small tweak. Brussels has proposed altering the status of wolves under the Bern Convention from “strictly protected” to “protected”. Politicians claim this will provide “further flexibility” and allow wolves to be hunted only if it becomes necessary to keep their growing numbers under control. After decades of effort that has allowed the animals to flourish once again, the European wolf population is now so large that it is classified as a species of “least concern” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Nevertheless, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) claims the European Commission is prioritising politics over science, and suggested the decision was influenced by “personal reasons after Commission President Von der Leyen’s pony was killed by a wolf”. Reports have previously described the 66-year-old German as pursuing a “relentless personal crusade” against wolves ever since Dolly was mauled, with diplomats in Brussels said to have described her alleged focus as both “puzzling” and “pushy”.

Conservationists worry the new ruling could be the start of a slippery slope. “Downgrading a species’ strict protection status for the political gain of a few, against scientific evidence, puts decades of conservation efforts at risk,” says Sabien Leemans, of the WWF. “Now, the European Commission is likely to propose the same change to the EU’s flagship Habitats Directive, with potential negative consequences far beyond the wolf.” The organisation argues that wolf populations in Europe have barely recovered after going extinct in most parts of the continent. “Weakening their protection could jeopardise this fragile recovery,” it said in a statement this week.

The WWF argues that wolf populations in Europe have barely recovered after going extinct in most parts of the continent - Philip Dumas/Moment RF

The WWF argues that wolf populations in Europe have barely recovered after going extinct in most parts of the continent - Philip Dumas/Moment RF

But announcing the review of wolf protection laws in September last year, Von der Leyen – known as “Röschen” by her family and as the Queen of Europe by political friends and foes alike – claimed the growing number of packs “has become a real danger for livestock and potentially also for humans”.

Animal rights activists admit that the first part is true, although manageable, but claim the second part is nonsense. The WWF points out that there has not been a single fatal attack on humans in Europe in the 21st century. Separate research found evidence of just six non-fatal wolf attacks on people in EU countries between 2002 and 2020. It is vanishingly rare for wolves even to growl at humans; wild boars are far more problematic.

They also point to a 25-year-long study conducted in the US states of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming which suggested that culling wolves actually led to more livestock being killed. The theory is that breaking up packs hastens the speed with which new breeding pairs are formed – in the same way that pruning a shrub can encourage fresh growth. France agreed to wolf culls in 2017 and roughly a fifth of the population is shot each year but the number of sheep kills has continued to rise – hitting 12,000 in 2022 alone.

Opponents of the new measure claim that politicians are whipping up a culture war and exaggerating the threat of the wolves as an easy way to prove they understand the concerns of rural voters. Wolf culls have been a key pledge of the far-Right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party during its recent surge in popularity. They have also become a touchstone in the struggle against an over-mighty bureaucracy, with previous attempts to introduce culls getting snarled up in legal wranglings.

“Stripping wolves of their protection risks undoing decades of European conservation progress,” says Sofie Ruysschaert, of BirdLife Europe. “Instead of investing in science-based coexistence measures between humans and wildlife, leaders have chosen a political narrative that scapegoats wildlife for broader societal challenges.”

Wolves were more or less wiped out across most of western Europe in the 19th century. Local legend has it that the last wolf in Belgium, for example, was shot by King Leopold II in the 1890s. They crept back into the continent from Russia after the end of the Cold War, through Poland and abandoned farms in East Germany after the Berlin Wall had come down. The number of wolves in the EU has almost doubled since 2012. A Europe-wide assessment in September 2022 found that the total number of wolves in the 27 EU member states is likely to be “in the order of 19,000”.

From central Europe they have spread to Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark and across the Alps into France. Italy is thought to be home to the largest population, of roughly 3,300. But there are large numbers in Spain, Romania and Bulgaria too.

For conservationists, the European grey wolf became a powerful symbol of the ability of nature to heal itself but also the possibility of humans coexisting with other predators. They also point to evidence from the United States that suggests the reintroduction of an apex predator to an area can result in a host of benefits cascading through the ecosystem. When wolves returned to Yellowstone National Park, the number of grazing herbivores fell, which resulted in more diverse vegetation to the benefit of insects. The United Kingdom, one of the few European countries that haven’t sought to reintroduce wolves, is struggling with the burgeoning population of deer in the countryside, with numbers doubling to an estimated two million since 1999, which is creating problems for arable farmers and other wildlife.

For conservationists, the European grey wolf is a symbol of the possibility of humans coexisting with other predators - Freder/E+
For conservationists, the European grey wolf is a symbol of the possibility of humans coexisting with other predators - Freder/E+

In Europe, wolves appear to have adapted well to human-dominated habitats. But this inevitably brings them into close proximity with livestock. DNA evidence lifted from Dolly’s mangled carcass showed that she was killed by a mature male wolf known as GW950m, who was responsible for the deaths of around 70 sheep, horses, cattle and goats. He was classified as a “problem wolf”, and a permit was issued that allowed hunters to shoot him even before the latest changes to European laws (although he remains at large to this day).

Dietary analysis shows that wolves mainly eat roe deer and wild boars. But roughly a sixth of their diet can be livestock. According to the EU’s own research, roughly 40,000 sheep are killed by wolves each year. This is only 0.06 per cent of the continent’s total ovine population and farmers are compensated for every animal killed, with roughly €19 million (£15.7 million) reportedly paid out to date. Wolves also attack goats, cattle and, as the unfortunate incident in Lower Saxony illustrates, horses and ponies.

For their part, farmers say they are prepared to accept a certain amount of damage but the averages conceal areas where the problem is in danger of getting out of control. Anti-wolf fencing is very expensive and impractical in some areas. In 2023, Georg Kaltenhauser, a sixth-generation Austrian farmer, lost 17 sheep and five goats of his 50-head flock in the mountains above Hollerbach Valley. The 71-year-old recently told Irish Farmers Journal that wolves were becoming “a major threat” in the area and that farmers were becoming increasingly reluctant to have their livestock grazing on mountain pastures in the summer.

Many point to the example of Sweden, which despite supposedly being under the purview of EU laws, limits its wolf population to roughly 300 adults and, along with Finland, maintains “wolf-free zones” in the northern parts of the country in which reindeer roam. Farmers tell conservationists the situation is getting to a point where it is possible to have high-welfare, free-range livestock or an uncontrolled wolf population – but not both. Something has to give and Brussels has decreed that not all the animals can live happily ever after.

The Telegraph approached Ursula von der Leyen’s office for comment : Story by Ben Wright: The Telegraph 

Dramatic photo captures moment giant bird closes hidden 3rd eyelid while snatching locust from mid-air

Dramatic photo captures moment giant bird closes hidden 3rd eyelid while snatching locust from mid-air

A bizarre photograph captures the moment a secretary bird (Sagittarius serpentarius) closes its third eyelid as it catches a locust midflight. The image is one of the winners of the 2024 Royal Society Publishing Photography Competition, which is run in collaboration with the Royal Photographic Society, and recognizes images showing hidden scientific phenomena in the natural world.

The secretary bird was captured by biologist and photographer Peter Hudson, who was named winner of the ecology and environmental science category.

 Secretary bird gullet by Peter Hudson. (Image credit: Secretary bird gullet by Peter Hudson.

Secretary bird gullet by Peter Hudson. (Image credit: Secretary bird gullet by Peter Hudson.

"Secretary birds are closely related to falcons but have evolved a stork-like mode of life, where they stalk around the savannah and feed on locusts, lizards and amphibians by punching them on the ground," Hudson said in a statement emailed to Live Science. "This bird has just caught a locust, and as it swallows its prey, it synchronously closes its third eyelid, the nictitating membrane, across its eyes to protect them from damage."

 

Secretary birds are large birds of prey — reaching around 4 feet (1.2 meters) in height — with an eagle-like body that sits on long, crane-like legs. They're native to sub-Saharan Africa and, while they can fly, they spend most of their time walking through long grasses looking for food.

Hudson's image reveals the bird's third eyelid, which looks like a blue ball sitting in the eye socket. According to the National Audubon Society, the third eyelid sits beneath the upper and lower lids. It's hinged at the inner side of the eye and moves horizontally across the eyeball to keep it free of dust, wind and hazards — giving the eyelids the nickname "nature's goggles."

An aerial image of four sharks hunting in a school of fish was named overall winner of the competition. It was taken by Angela Albi, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany who studies interactions between sharks and fish.

 

"Just after sunrise or before sundown, the shallow waters of the Maldives become a clear, see-through surface," she said in the statement. "These are also the moments when we best observe the interactions between reef sharks and their prey. In this frame, captured during a research trip in 2024, a shark on the far left shifts suddenly from swimming calmly within the school to initiating a hunt, its body posture standing out from the others. While we still don't know what triggers these attacks, we analyze videos to study how sharks hunt and how their prey responds collectively." 

Story by Hannah Osborne; Live Science

New cat and dog law comes into force with five year jail penalty and hefty fine

New cat and dog law comes into force with five year jail penalty and hefty fine

Pet abduction has officially been made a criminal offence, with offenders facing up to five years behind bars.

The Pet Abduction Bill received Royal Assent on Friday, May 24, and slaps pet thieves in England or Northern Ireland with a lengthy jail sentence, a hefty fine, or both. The new legislation acknowledges that pets are more than just property; they're sentient beings who feel the pain of separation and emotional distress when snatched from their loving homes.

 

Shocking figures from the Pet Theft Taskforce reveal that in 2020 alone, police were alerted to approximately 2,000 dog thefts and over 400 catnappings, leaving owners and pets in turmoil. With 28% of UK adults having a dog as a pet, and 24% a cat, it's no wonder pet theft strikes a nerve with the nation. 

The Act is part of a broader initiative to safeguard pets, including the upcoming mandatory microchipping of cats from June 10, 2024. It means lost or stolen companions can be swiftly reunited with their families, Nottinghamshire Live reports.

Championing the cause in Parliament, MP Anna Firth said: "We are showing by our actions that cats and dogs are not just items, and that abducting them causes real distress to families and to individuals. Because actions speak far louder than words and this Bill will send a signal that we take animal welfare seriously in the UK."

Pet abduction has officially been made a criminal offence
Pet abduction has officially been made a criminal offence© Getty Images/iStockphoto

MP Ben Everitt hailed the new bill a crucial fix for "a gap that has existed in law for far too long", pointing out that current laws fail to recognise the true impact of pet theft. During the report stage of the bill, Tory ex-minister Sirristopher Chope suggested the legislation should be limited to microchipped dogs and cats. 

The MP argued: "If you don't have your cat or dog microchipped, then you shouldn't be able to expect the law to come to rush to your assistance in the event of your cat or dog being abducted. So, because apart from anything else, if you complain to the police that your cat or dog has been abducted and it hasn't been microchipped, it is all the more difficult to identify it and search for it, and so on."He added: "It seemed to me that on that great principle of English equity, if you seek to come to the law, and protection of the law, you should come with clean hands." With compulsory microchipping for dogs already in place and set to extend to pet cats from June under new Government reforms, these changes aim to streamline access to microchip records, enhance the accuracy of the data, and unify databases.

Environment minister Robbie Moore assured that guidance will be given to the police, saying: "In the event that they can recover an abducted cat or dog that is not microchipped, they have the power to issue a notice under English microchipping regulations requiring pets to be microchipped within 21 days. For completeness, failing to comply with such a notice is an offence and subject to a fine of £500."

Sir Christopher also argued the bill should be extended to cover other pets such as tortoises. MPs agreed to amend the Bill to ensure the sections on dog and cat abduction also extend to Wales. Animal welfare charity Cats Protection welcomed the bill, saying it will "finally give pets the full recognition they deserve".The charity's senior advocacy and government relations officer Annabel Berdy said it will "help stamp out the criminal activities that prey on much-loved pet cats by onward selling or from breeding kittens to sell".

Story by Neil Shaw & Zahra Khaliq: Mirror

Tick season: Vet shares how to protect your long-haired pup from plague of parasites this summer

Tick season: Vet shares how to protect your long-haired pup from plague of parasites this summer

The dreaded tick season is upon us - and if you’ve got a long-haired dog, you need to take care

Story by Amber Allott

Login

Login

Who's On Line

We have 164 guests and no members online

Featured Video

 


Canine Feeding Schedules

Essential Oils

Zone - Text

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.

Ok
X

Right Click

No right click